Ateneo Tops UP in World List of Universities on a “Problematic Survey”
Ateneo de Manila University is now the leading tertiary school in the Philippines, topping University of the Phillipines on a “problematic survey” that the UP itself did not participate in. This is based on The Times Higher Education-Quacquarelli Symonds (THE-QS) World University Rankings 2008.
The ranking was based on criteria including peer and employer review, faculty-student ratio and citations of teaching staff (UP perhaps got low points on these categories: employer review, faculty-student ratio).

Ateneo Tops UP in World List on a “Problematic Survey” - Ateneo Official Seal
The survey revealed that the Jesuit-led Ateneo was leading the pack in the Philippines, followed by UP, De La Salle University or DLSU, and finally University of Santo Tomas or UST.
University of the Philippines (UP), ranked No. 2, falling from the top position in 2007. But the UP dismissed the results of THE-QS’s study saying the surveyor’s “methodology is problematic”.
Ateneo leaped from between 400th and 500th position last year into 254th place. Ateneo ranks between London’s School of Oriental and African Studies and the Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Spain.
UP, the country’s premier state university fell 20 places short of Ateneo. It is now in 274th place, up from 398th last year. UP was placed between two German universities—the University of Hamburg and Ulm University.
DLSU and UST are both fresh entries and they ranked 415th and 470th, respectively. Both DLSU and UST were not in the top 500 last year.
Of course Ateneo was happy about the result. The Inquirer on the other hand reported that UP raised doubts on the survey’s validity, saying the university did not take part in this year’s survey.
University of the Philippines vice president for public affairs Cristina Pantoja Hidalgo said the state university did not join because the survey organizers refused to disclose where and how they got their data.
“Since it does not specify who are surveyed or what questions are asked, the methodology is problematic,” Hidalgo added.
For this year’s survey, UP was not invited to participate, she said.
Hidalgo said UP president Emerlinda Roman only received an e-mail message from QS Asia Pacific director, Mandy Mok, notifying her that UP had “gone up in the rankings.”
The QS e-mail also informed UP that it could advertise in the 2009 Top University Guide and join the university fair for a fee of $49,000, Hidalgo said.
“UP can hardly be expected to spend more than P2 million on publicity for itself involving a survey conducted by an organization that refuses to divulge where it obtains its data,” Hidalgo said.
Question, did Ateneo pay P2 million? How can you win a contest you didn’t even join?
This Philippine News entitled Ateneo Tops UP in World List of Universities on a “Problematic Survey” and is labeled with the following Tags: ateneo de manila, de la salle university, dlsu, faculty student, german universities, inquirer, la salle university, list, madrid spain, school of oriental and african studies, student ratio, symonds, tertiary school, times higher education, ulm university, universidad autonoma de madrid, university, university of hamburg, university of santo tomas, university of the philippines, university of the phillipines, world university rankings and was published on Oct 17, 2008 in Academics, Philippine News










































On Oct 28, 2008, 宝茹 said:
This survey is biased based on the factors.
Reply
On Feb 2, 2009, 1991 said:
UP stopped participating in the survey for quite some time and I don’t hear any news of them complaining on the results. How come they reacted on the results after they got beaten? I guess they don’t consider the survey problematic when they’re number 1 in the Phil.
Reply
On Mar 17, 2009, Gabz said:
I agree. And who said the survey was “problematic” to begin with? Guess what? It was UP (aka. university of patayan / university of pangit na surroundings / university of pababa na nang pababa ang quality ng turo).
Over the past year, Ateneo has worked really hard to globalize the university in terms of facilities, programs and linkages abroad, so how come UP is biting ADMU’s head off for a report it didn’t have control over, and which only reveals the fruits of its labor? A piece of advice for the iskolars: improve your university and maybe you’d win number 1 again next year. But then again, maybe not.
Reply
On Apr 12, 2009, Jared said:
Why UP needs to complain when it is on the TOP. Based on our history here in RP, the best students come from UP.
If we check the data of each University, the number of students who excel in all fields are from UP.
The mere fact that we call it STATE UNIVERSITY is because it is the premier!
Reply
On Oct 10, 2009, crap said:
ADMU beats UP again in the 2009 edition of the THES-QS World University Rankings!
Ateneo – 234th
UP – 262nd
Reply
On Oct 20, 2009, crap said:
Ateneo dethrones UP again in the 11th FINEX Intercollegiate Finance Competition 2009.
ADMU – Champion
UP Diliman – 1st runner-up
DLSU- 2nd runner-up
NUS Singapore – 3rd runner up
This year, over 90 local schools participated in the prestigious competition, together with Chulalongkorn and Assumption University of Thailand, NUS Singapore, and University of Hongkong.
This marks the second year that the top 3 Philippine schools bested not only their local counterparts but their Asian colleagues as well.
2007 – ADMU / UP / NUS
2008 – UP / ADMU / DLSU
2009 – ADMU / UP / DLSU
Reply